tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-433440494954489625.post7873836773623864669..comments2009-12-15T09:35:32.509-08:00Comments on Existentialism @ Rhodes: Love Is DeadDoctor Jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13189506916480012553noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-433440494954489625.post-50825815244069824062009-10-12T09:37:08.853-07:002009-10-12T09:37:08.853-07:00Are love and good faith comparable? I agree that, ...Are love and good faith comparable? I agree that, in terms of good faith, it cannot be achieved because it requires "intense work" and worry which violates the idea of good faith in general, but I would say that love, in the relationship sense, is one of the few things that occurs naturally and without effort or worry. In terms of a relationship, I would say love is a balance between facticity and transcendent possibilities; one finds oneself in a relationship and genuinely enjoys it, and as such embraces the possibilities of the development of that relationship with very little anguish. True, at time a loving relationship seems as if it would require some effort, but in general I think that true love is highlighted by a natural existence.Eric Stradleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10713125859685542515noreply@blogger.com